On this page
What is the 70/20/10 framework?
The 70/20/10 framework is a learning model that splits professional development into three reinforcing channels: 70% on-the-job experience, 20% learning from others, and 10% formal training. It was developed at the Center for Creative Leadership in the 1980s from a study of successful executives — and the ratios are descriptive (what worked), not prescriptive (what you must hit).
The practical value is that it forces a development plan away from its most common failure mode: a pile of courses with no on-the-job reinforcement. When a plan is built around a real gap (say, stakeholder management), the 70% anchors it in actual work, the 20% provides coaching scaffolding, and the 10% supplies the vocabulary and frameworks.
Why the 70% delivers more autonomy and more ROI
The fastest way to see why 70/20/10 is shaped the way it is: plot each learning channel against two axes that actually matter to an HR leader — learner autonomy (how much the employee drives their own development) and return on training investment (how much measurable capability you get per dollar and per hour).
Active learning (courses) sits in the low-autonomy, low-ROI corner: the learner is passive, the knowledge is generic, and measurable outcomes are minimal. Social learning (coaching, peer feedback) climbs the curve — the learner engages, the content is contextualized, and ROI improves. Stretch assignments occupy the outer arc: maximum autonomy, maximum ROI, because the learner is solving real problems under real constraints with real consequences.
This is why the 70/20/10 ratios hold up across decades of follow-up research: they’re not a theoretical balance, they’re a reflection of where real capability actually forms.
Why courses alone don’t stick: the retention argument
The strongest argument for the 70% isn’t autonomy or ROI — it’s retention. Ebbinghaus’s classic forgetting-curve research and decades of corporate L&D studies converge on the same finding: knowledge acquired through formal training alone is mostly gone within 30 days. Not 30% gone — around 70-85% gone.
Add coaching on top of the course and retention roughly doubles. Add on-the-job application of the same content and retention stabilizes above 65% long after the training event. The training budget hasn’t changed — the learning modality has. This is the concrete answer to the CFO question “why can’t we just send people on more courses?” Because courses alone are the leakiest bucket L&D can buy.
Huneety generates gap-driven 70/20/10 plans automatically
Pull competency gap data from your 360 or assessment, pick a target role, and get a 3-channel plan your manager can review in minutes.
How to apply 70/20/10 to an individual development plan
Start from a single competency gap — not a list of goals. A good IDP targets one or two competencies at a time, because development requires sustained attention over weeks, not a rotating menu.
- 170% on the job — two stretch assignments in the next quarter that require the target competency. Specific, observable, time-bound. Not ‘get more exposure’.
- 220% from others — one weekly coaching check-in with the manager or a senior peer. Structured around the stretch assignments, not generic feedback.
- 310% formal training — one short course or book providing the vocabulary and frameworks the stretch assignments will draw on.
The ratios are a sanity check, not a quota. If your plan is 90% courses, something is wrong. If it’s 100% on-the-job with no coaching, the employee is learning alone — also wrong. The three channels exist because they reinforce each other.
Common mistakes with 70/20/10
Treating the ratios as a quota
The 70/20/10 numbers came from a survey, not a calculation. Your plan can be 60/30/10 or 80/15/5 depending on the competency and the employee’s level. What matters is that all three channels show up, not that the ratios are exact.
Skipping the 20% because ‘the manager is busy’
The 20% is where the 70% becomes learning instead of just work. If the manager can’t carve out 15 minutes a week, swap them with a senior peer — but do not delete the channel. An employee doing stretch assignments without feedback is a performance review accident waiting to happen.
Loading up the 10% with unrelated courses
The formal training slot is not where you put every course the LMS suggests. It should map directly to the vocabulary the stretch assignments need. One well-chosen course beats five general ones.
QUICK ANSWERS
Quick answers
- Does the 70/20/10 split need to be exact?
- No. The ratios come from a survey of what worked, not a prescription. A plan can be 60/30/10 or 80/15/5 depending on the competency and the employee's level. What matters is that all three channels show up and reinforce each other — not that the math is precise.
- Can I use 70/20/10 for soft skills like communication?
- Yes — and soft skills are actually where 70/20/10 shines most. Communication, stakeholder management, and leadership cannot be learned from a course alone. They require on-the-job practice (70%) with a coach giving real-time feedback (20%), with the 10% supplying the vocabulary to name what's happening.
- Who is responsible for the 20% coaching component?
- The direct manager by default, but it can be delegated to a senior peer, mentor, or external coach if the manager doesn't have the skill or bandwidth. What matters is that the coaching is structured around the 70% stretch assignments — not generic career advice.
Continue learning
IDP Templates
Free downloadable IDP templates by role — manager, IC, technical leader, first-time manager.
Read the guide
Gap Analysis for IDPs
How to translate assessment results into the two or three priority gaps that anchor every plan.
Read the guide
IDPs for Managers
Writing development plans for people who manage people. Scorecards, execution dimensions, and the link to succession planning.
Read the guide